It is almost obligatory these days for a photography blog to log down what equipment is being used. Maybe it’s bragging, maybe it’s just a courtesy so someone in the market for some new hardware can see what results certain gear can get. For me, however, I find that a full and accurate model number appeals to my obsessive compulsive nature, so I like writing them down. There is also, I suppose, also an element of the former in there as well.
Most of this is not strictly relevant, so this is a breakdown of the equipment that’s in my camera bag, along with a few thoughts about them. The title links go straight to the Amazon product page. These are referrer links, so buying any of these product using the links will help support me and this often expensive hobby.
I really love this camera. I previously owned an EOS 400D which was great as a starter DSLR but after six months of posting on this blog it was becoming apparent that I had outgrown that camera and its capabilities. Compared to the 400D, the 60D has 18 megapixels to the 400D’s 10, four times the ISO sensitivity, and full HD video recording. Despite being larger, it also feels lighter, and more rugged. It has a fancy fold-out LCD screen too, allowing me to take shots at ground level with ease.
This is my work-a-day lens; with my old kit I had an 18-55mm lens and a 55-250mm lens, and the lack of crossover between the two lenses’ focal lengths and the relative lack of zoom on the shorter lens meant I was swapping lenses frequently, and could almost be guaranteed to never have the right lens on my camera at the right time.
When I upgraded to the 60D I realised I needed more than a standard kit lens, and I settled on this lens, giving me a nice wide focal range and minimising the need to swap out lenses any time anything happened more than a few yards away. It also has Canon’s really quite effective Image Stabilization technology, which allows me to get photos like this one (with a full second exposure) without a tripod.
For the times when 135mm is still not enough, I have this lens. Unlike my last set of equipment, the lower focal length of this one crosses over with my ‘main’ lens so I less frequently find myself with the wrong glass. The 300mm top end, meanwhile, can get pretty close to wildlife or aircraft. Many of the closeup photos of planes in the Bournemouth Air Festival megapost were taken with this lens. I’m not sure if it’s the fault of the lens or the camera body, but the autofocus can tend to hunt around quite a bit at times, and there is no full-time override of the focus ring to correct this.
Beyond my two main lenses, I have a couple of other more specialised lenses that allow me to play about and get some interesting results. This one is a macro lens, allowing me to focus on items only about 15cm in front of the glass, great for insects or extreme closeups. It has 1:1 reproduction, meaning whatever you’re photographing can appear up to life-size on the camera’s sensor, leading to some incredible closeups. The lack of Image Stabilization can be an issue in lower light however, and when you’re focusing really close with the widest aperture setting, the depth of field is millimetres thin – this lens, thankfully, has full-time manual override on the focus, so you can easily adjust if the autofocus hasn’t quite got it right. The autofocus is also really fast. For times when you can lock off the camera and use a longer exposure, the aperture closes all the way in to f/32.
The lens also focuses to infinity, and its big aperture allows for a nice shallow depth of field, which means I also intend to use it for some portrait work. It’s also useful for mid- to near-range wildlife photography, as you won’t have a problem with animals getting too close to be able to focus on them, unless they are actually intending to steal or eat you or your camera.
I’ve seen this lens dubbed the “nifty fifty” in reviews, and that sums it up perfectly. It is a very cheap lens – about £80 at time of writing – but has a big aperture for a very narrow depth of field, and the results are stunning for such a cheap lens. Sure, the autofocus is a bit loud, and it feels like a lens that costs £80, but the results punch far above its weight.
A relatively recent addition to my kit, Canon’s midlevel flashgun. It’s reasonably powerful (I’ve taken photos in near-completely dark rooms that look brightly lit) and more importantly for me can be fired wirelessly using the 60D’s built-in remote trigger so I can get a side-lit subject. I’ve not had occasion to use it too heavily, but it has seen action in this set of practise images, as well as most of the images on this page, and saw use as a fill flash in some of the images in this post.
When I upgraded to the 60D, I also needed to upgrade to a bigger camera bag, my old Crumpler Pretty Boy not really being big enough for camera and all my lenses (I do still use the Pretty Boy, however, when travelling light, as it is the perfect size for the 60D and my two main lenses). After a bit of searching, and even one returned alternative, I finally settled on the Crumpler New Delhi. I decided against a ‘backpack’ type bag like a Lowepro as I’m often on a bike whilst scouting for photos and need to be able to swing my bag round and grab my camera and any other kit without dismounting. The bag can get a bit heavy when fully loaded, but if you have a lot of gear to lug around, you need something big. It also has space for a 15″ laptop, but if you add that to all your camera kit and walk around for any length of time, it will redefine pain for you in a very real way.
My choice in this bag was justified only a few weeks later when, whilst in Bournemouth photographing the annual Air Festival, we got caught in torrential downpours that caused flash floods and washed bits of the town into the sea. When I say ‘caught in’, I do mean we were outside in the rain at one point, getting completely and totally soaked through. The Crumpler, however, proved to be completely resistant to mother nature. Even the event programme, which was in the bag but outside of the ‘inner’ bag that contains my kit, didn’t have a drop of water on it. Since then I now proudly describe the bag as “more waterproof than Bournemouth”.
As I am starting to experiment more with night, macro and astro photography (well, by ‘astro photography’ I mean ‘the moon’), I needed to invest in a remote shutter release so I could fire the camera without jogging it. This remote, a steal at only a tenner, replicates all of the function of the 60D’s shutter button, with the added bonus of a lock so if you’re using bulb mode at night you don’t have to stand around like a lemon during long exposures.
I don’t often use a tripod, although admittedly I am finding myself using one more as I experiment with night and HDR photography. However, for me portability is a big issue – I don’t want to be carrying around a ruddy great tripod on the off chance that I am going to need it. This is where the Gorillapod comes in. It is small enough to fit in my bag without getting in the way of adding noticeable weight, but is there when I need it. The main downside, of course, is that you need somewhere to attach it so you are more limited for positions compared to a ‘full’ tripod.
The iPhone deserves a mention in this section as I do often use it for on-the-fly photography. Most of the time when I’m at work I won’t have my DSLR on me, as there’s no point in lugging it to and from work every day, so my iPhone is all I have when a photo presents itself. Which is why it’s fortunate the iPhone has a pretty decent camera and can get some good results. It also has various apps, such as Instagram, for creating content on the go. I’ve been an iPhone user since day 3 (not quite day one, but pretty close), and it’s amazing to see how far this device has come as a portable camera.
Another of those small but useful bits of kit, this is basically a tripod mount for the iPhone 4, allowing me to mount it to my Gorillapod. It helped greatly in, for instance, my time-lapse experiment, and will do so again in the future for some ideas I have in mind.
On top of the lot listed above, I also have various filters for some of my lenses (mainly polarising and UV).
Most of my editing is done on an iMac. The big screen is fantastic for picking out little details in images and the 3TB of storage means that I’m not going to run out of space for photographs any time soon. Although I’m sure I will eventually.
I’ve tricked out the computer, so it has a 3.4GHz Intel i7 processor, 32GB of RAM, a 3TB Fusion Drive, and a decent graphics chip.
Whenever I’m out and about for any length of time, I bring my MacBook Air with me. It has 256GB of storage so I can shoot thousands of images and store them there before I get home and transfer them across to the iMac. It also means, if I’m on holiday, I can edit my pictures in the go before I even get home.
For photo post-processing, I use Aperture. I prefer this over Photoshop because it has a library function, so all of my photos are kept in a sensible, easily searchable and referable place. It also outputs whilst watermarks and resizing in a single step, and it uses non-destructive editing, so the master camera RAW file is left untouched by any changes you may make to it. I still use Photoshop, however, when making HDR images or for anything that needs more advanced image processing than what Aperture is capable of.